Categories Blog

Unity Vs. Unreal: Which Engine Best Supports Live Multiplayer Experiences?

Single-player games are still thriving, but modern players also want live, connected experiences. Whether it’s competing against each other or working together to defeat the opponents, players expect the best possible interaction when playing online.

This means that when working on their games, developers have to choose an engine that’s capable of supporting this while delivering high visual performance at the same time. So, which one is better: Unity or Unreal? Let’s find out.

Network Reliability and Real-Time Performance

The network layer plays the key role in any multiplayer system. It’s the developers’ job to ensure that all player actions and visual feedback are in sync with as little delay as possible. Both Unity and Unreal allow them to do this through a client-server model, but they differ in how deeply networking is woven into the engine’s foundation.

With Unity, the focus is pretty much on flexibility. Developers can use its Netcode for GameObjects framework, but can also go for a third-party solution, such as Photon, Mirror, or Fish-Networking. While this method offers more freedom, it also requires more setup and integration.

Unreal Engine, on the other hand, embeds networking directly into its architecture through its Dedicated Server and Actor Replication System. This makes it much easier to synchronize gameplay logic across clients without the use of any external tools. Its authoritative server model, the same system used to power the popular Battle Royale game Fortnite, provides access to a foundation for competitive, large-scale online games.

Real-time interactions are becoming crucial in every genre. For example, popular Malaysia online casino platforms now have live poker rooms where all interaction with dealers and other players happens in real time. Developers have to ensure that everything from the engine they use to the way data is transmitted brings players a smooth and responsive experience.

Visuals and Performance in a Live Environment

In this age of gaming, visuals are an extremely important part of every game. The end goal is always to build a game that not only offers interesting gameplay and works well online, but also looks stunning. This is another part of the process that Unity and Unreal engines treat differently.

Let’s start with Unreal this time because this engine excels in terms of graphics. It’s known for its high-end rendering pipeline that’s powered by Ninite for virtualized geometry and Lumen for dynamic global illumination. It also supports efficient Level of Detail (LOD) streaming, which ensures frame rates remain stable even in large and complex environments. Given all this, it’s no surprise Unreal is behind some of the biggest titles in the world of gaming.

Unity, at this point, cannot match the visuals offered by Unreal. Still, it has its Universal Render Pipeline (URP) and High Definition Render Pipeline (HDRP) that developers can use to optimize graphics based on their target platform. This is extremely important, especially when building cross-platform games.

Therefore, Unreal definitely wins in terms of raw graphical power, but Unity offers more adaptability. Both have their uses, it’s just about what works best for every specific project.

Tools and Scalability

The work in front of developers doesn’t end with the game’s release. As more people start playing, the game has to be able to handle the extra load without any problems.

Unity is great because it’s easy to use and allows you to work in different ways. Its lightweight editor and large asset store make it easy to create prototypes quickly, and C# scripting makes it easier for teams with different levels of experience to get started. The engine’s cloud ecosystem, which includes Unity Cloud Build, Relay, and Lobby, also continues to evolve. It now offers more integrated backend services to support live multiplayer games without the need for a lot of custom infrastructure.

On the other hand, Unreal Engine is made to be used on a large scale. Its Online Subsystem (OSS) has built-in support for session management, matchmaking, and leaderboards across all major platforms. When used with Epic Online Services, developers also have access to powerful backend features that are deeply integrated into the Unreal ecosystem.

The downside is that this makes things more complicated. The C++ base of Unreal and the fact that it has a steeper learning curve can make it harder for smaller teams or projects with limited technical resources to iterate quickly. But Unreal gives studios the best control and performance at scale, if they can figure out how to use it.